Informing & Monitoring
» Capitol Updates
» Leg. Watch
» Press Releases
» Leg Vote Record
» CA Cost Index
» Features
» Audio & Reports
» Job Data
» Calendar
» Coalitions
» Fed Update 
» Policy Objectives
» Policy Principles


Membership
»Invest in CMTA
»About Us
»Yellow Pages
»Questions?

Conferences
 Oct. 21 California's Regulatory Landscape -- GETTING IT RIGHT

Directories


»CMTA Staff
»Send us e-mail
»Directions to CMTA
»Rent Conference Room



Services & Discounts
  »Group WC Program
  »Discount Programs
  »ETP


Grassroots Activism
Sign up to receive action alerts

Already registered?






Calendar

»Full listing

Committee meetings:
 Sept. 8
CMTA Climate Change Advisory Committee

 Sept. 9
Energy

 Sept. 9
Corporate Counsel

 Sept. 16
Government Relations

 Sept. 16
Tax

 Sept. 17
Labor Employment

 Sept. 22
CMTA Climate Change Advisory Committee

 Sept. 23
Energy

 Sept. 23
Environmental quality

 Oct. 7
Energy

 Oct. 13
CMTA Climate Change Advisory Committee

 Oct. 14
Corporate Counsel

 Oct. 15
Labor Employment

 Oct. 21
Environmental quality
California's Regulatory Landscape -- GETTING IT RIGHT

 Oct. 21
Tax

 Oct. 22
Board of Directors

 Oct. 27
CMTA Climate Change Advisory Committee

 Oct. 28
Environmental quality

 Nov. 4
Energy


Contact us at members@cmta.net
 
Employer Grassroots
Get action alerts
and send targeted e-mails to legislators
Already registered?
    

Employee Grassroots
Encourage your employees to register to vote

CMTA legislative database

SB 532
CEQA Risk Assessments

Latest CMTA position: OPPOSE
CEQA already contains the most rigorous environmental protection requirements in the nation. Employers spend billions of dollars annually complying with these tough environmental rules. Unnecessary studies will add more costs, making products and services more expensive, killing jobs.


This is a job killer bill. View more job killers here.
Click here to learn more about the Jobs1st coalition

Author: Romero (D - SD 24)

LegInfo: Bill text

Location: Failed passage

Requires cumulative health risk assessments where a "reasonable possibility" exists that a project subject to CEQA would create a significant risk to public health from exposure to toxic substances. This concept is sufficiently vague that these highly complex risk assessments could become a default requirement, even if the project itself is an insignificant contributor. Moreover, absent any scientifically accepted methodology, projects would suffer major delays and cost increases driven by disputes over risk assessment and mitigation.




CMTA staff information
CMTA lobbyist: Mike Rogge